This guide puts the three structures side by side with real numbers so you can compare them at your actual hiring volume and make the right call.
The Three RPO Pricing Structures
| Model | How it works | Best for | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Per-hire | Fixed fee per placement (e.g. ₹1.5L to ₹3L per hire) | Low or unpredictable volume | High cost if volume spikes |
| Monthly retainer | Fixed monthly fee for dedicated recruiter capacity (e.g. ₹2L to ₹5L per recruiter per month) | Steady, predictable volume above 15 hires/year | Paying for capacity in slow months |
| Hybrid | Lower retainer plus reduced per-hire fee (e.g. ₹1.5L/month + ₹1L per hire) | Transitioning companies, moderate volume | Complexity in tracking both elements |
Per-Hire Pricing: When It Fits
Per-hire is the cleanest structure for companies with low or unpredictable volume: you pay for output, not capacity. The downside is that the per-hire fee is set to cover slow months as well as busy ones, so it is almost always the most expensive per hire at volume. Use it when you cannot predict how many hires the quarter will produce.
Monthly Retainer: When It Fits
Retainer pricing funds dedicated capacity: a recruiter or team working exclusively on your roles. The fixed fee does not change with the number of hires, so cost per hire falls as volume rises. This is the right model once hiring is steady, usually past fifteen hires a year. An embedded RPO on retainer also gives you brand consistency and a team that knows your roles deeply over time.
Hybrid: When It Fits
Hybrid splits the cost between a lower base and a per-hire variable, reducing the risk of paying full retainer in a slow month. It suits companies in transition: past the point where agencies make sense, but not yet confident enough in their volume forecast to commit to a full retainer.
Running the Numbers
At 24 hires a year (two per month): per-hire at ₹2L per hire costs ₹48L. Retainer at ₹3.5L per month costs ₹42L and includes all hires. Hybrid at ₹1.5L per month plus ₹1L per hire costs ₹18L retainer plus ₹24L variable, totalling ₹42L. At this volume all three are similar. At 48 hires a year the retainer becomes the clear winner. The break-even is the number to solve for before signing.
Not sure which RPO pricing model fits your volume?
Tell us your hire count and we will model the break-even across all three structures.
Book a Discovery Call →The right model is not about which looks cheapest on the quote. It is about which aligns cost to the volume you can actually forecast. Most companies that switch to retainer do so after one quarter of per-hire fees at higher-than-expected volume. Running the model in advance avoids that. The RPO and embedded hiring practice can structure any of the three; the conversation starts with your forecast, not ours.
Want the break-even modelled for your volume?
Send us your quarterly hire target and we will return the model within a week.
Book a Consultation →