Specialist SearchEngineering & AIDesignIndia
Arya.ai

Seven specialist hires. 100% offer acceptance.

Arya.ai needed to add talent across data science, research, engineering and design without loosening the quality bar. Talhive closed seven roles with a 40-day average time to hire and 100% offer acceptance.

Discuss a specialist mandate →
7
Roles closed
40 days
Average time to hire
4:1
Interview to hire
100%
Offer acceptance
The mandate

Build across AI, engineering and design at the same time.

Arya.ai was hiring across data science, research, full stack engineering and UI/UX design, with several roles requiring immediate attention. The mandate was to move quickly while holding a consistent hiring bar across very different specialist talent markets.

Seven hires, four disciplines, one standard.

Mandate context
ClientArya.ai, AI product company
Service modelSpecialist search, multi discipline
RolesData Scientist, Research Scientist, Full Stack Developer, UI/UX Designer
FunctionsAI, data, engineering, design
LocationIndia
Outcome7 roles closed, 100% offer acceptance
Why this mandate was different

Four disciplines.
Four different candidate markets.

A research scientist cannot be searched for in the same way as a full stack developer. A data scientist and a UI/UX designer are read through different evidence, sourced from different pools, and moved by different reasons. The challenge was not generating more candidates. It was running several specialist searches at once without turning any of them into a high volume funnel.

Data Scientist

The broadest pool of the four and the easiest to misread. Applied modelling that survives contact with production looks very different on paper from analytics work carrying the same title.

Research Scientist

A small market where the work itself is the signal. The problems chosen and the results published say more than the title, and the reason to move is rarely compensation.

Full Stack Developer

Assessed on ownership rather than stack. In a small AI product team the same engineer carries the interface and the service behind it, so breadth has to be real rather than claimed.

UI/UX Designer

Designers are read through the decisions behind the work rather than the polish of the portfolio. For an AI product the interesting question is how the interface handles uncertainty.

What Talhive changed

One hiring mandate. Separate search logic for every role.

Four searches ran in parallel, each with its own market and its own calibration, against one shared quality bar.

01

Role specific market mapping

Each discipline was treated as its own market rather than pushed through one generic technology sourcing funnel.

02

Evidence before presentation

Candidates were screened against the requirements of the role before they reached Arya.ai, which kept interview volume low and the conversations technical.

03

Parallel execution

Multiple searches ran at the same time while calibration stayed separate for AI, engineering and design profiles, so feedback on one did not distort the others.

04

Candidate engagement through close

Talhive stayed close to candidates through the decision and offer stage, which contributed to 100% offer acceptance across the engagement.

What the client noticed
Ritesh Shetty, Head of Growth at Arya.ai

“Talhive helped us find the right talent that perfectly fit our needs in an incredibly short time frame. Their team demonstrated exceptional professionalism, efficiency, and an in-depth understanding of our requirements. I highly recommend Talhive to any organization seeking top-tier talent quickly and efficiently.”

Ritesh Shetty
Head of Growth · Arya.ai
The outcome

Seven roles closed across four specialist disciplines.

Talhive completed seven hires across AI, engineering and design, at a 40-day average time to hire.

The signal worth reading is not the number of hires. Arya.ai hired across four distinctly different talent markets while the process stayed selective enough to produce one hire for every four candidates interviewed.

7
Roles closed
40
Days average time to hire
4:1
Interview to hire ratio
100%
Offer acceptance
What this mandate shows

Specialist hiring gets weaker when every role is treated as “tech”.

AI research, data science, software engineering and design may sit inside the same organisation, but they do not share a talent market. The companies worth approaching are different, the evidence worth reading is different, and so is the reason a strong person picks up the phone.

The stronger approach is to keep one hiring standard and change the sourcing and assessment logic for each role. That is how Talhive runs specialist mandates across engineering, AI, product and design.

Related field notes

If you are hiring specialists in India

Next

Hiring across AI and engineering?

Bring us the roles. We will tell you where the talent actually sits, how the searches should differ, and where the hiring bar needs to stay the same.

Discuss a mandate → See how we hire engineering and AI →
Related mandates

More across the cluster

Discuss Your Hiring Needs